🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president asserting the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his address to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final resolution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the same language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this assault."